¥Ø«e¦ì¸m > ­º­¶ > ·|°T

·|­û±M°Ï

  • ±b¸¹¬°·|­û½s¸¹
    ¹w³]±K½X¬°¥Í¤é(¦è¤¸¦~/¤ë/¤é)
    ¨Ò¦p: ±b¸¹999 ±K½X1950/03/03
    (¤ë¤é¬°1~9½Ð¸É0)
  • ¨Ï¥ÎªÌ±b¸¹¡G
  • ±K½X¡G
  • ÅçÃÒ½X¡G(·Æ¹«ÂI¹Ï²£¥Í·sÃѧO½X)
  •  
  • refresh
  • demo
http://www.tago.org.tw

³Ì·s·|°T

2008-vol

¡ø¦^¥»´Á·|°T
¥xÆW°üÀùÂå¾Ç·|²Ä¤»©¡ 2008.12·|°T

¥xÆW°üÀùÂå¾Ç·|·|°T

2008 ¦~ 12¤ë     

²z¨Æªø: ¤ý¥\«GÂå®v

¯µ®Ñªø: ±i§Ó¶©Âå®v

¦U©e­û·|¥l¶°¤H:

³¹µ{©e­û·|¡GÁªø³ó²z¨Æ

°ê»Ú¨Æ°È©e­û·|¡G·¨¨|¥¿²z¨Æ

·|­û¸ê®æ¼f¬d©e­û·|¡G³¯¬è¦w±`°È²z¨Æ

°]°È©e­û·|¡GÃC©ú½å±`°È²z¨Æ

ÂåÀø¤Î­Û²z©e­û·|¡G¸­ÁpµÏ±`°È²z¨Æ

±Ð¨|©e­û·|¡G©P®¶¶§²z¨Æ

¾Ç³N¬ã¨s©e­û·|¡G±i§Ê¹ü±`°È²z¨Æ

°Æ¯µ®Ñªø¡G

¡@«n°Ï-ªL¯EÂå®v¡B¤¤°Ï-³¯¤l©MÂå®v¡B¥_°Ï-³¯¤l°·Âå®v

¾Ç·|ºô§}: www.tago.org.tw

¾Ç·|E-mail address: tago.gyn@gmail.com             

¾Ç·|¦a§}¡G¥x¥_¥«¤¤¤s°Ï¤¤¤s¥_¸ô¤G¬q92¸¹°¨°ºÂå°|¥­¦w¼Ó12¼Ó12043«Ç

¾Ç·|¹q¸Ü¡G¡]02¡^2543-3535 ext 3941

¾Ç·|¯µ®Ñ: ¶ÀâÀ·¤p©j

                                                        ¥»´Á½s¿è ³¯¤l°· Âå®v   

 

³ü¡B ·|°È³ø§i

¤@¡Bªñ´Á¾Ç·|¬¡°Ê

 

¤é´Á

¬¡°Ê¦WºÙ

¬¡°Ê¦aÂI

¥D¿ì³æ¦ì

2008.12.20

±M¬ìÂå®vºÂ¼f

¥x¥_°¨°ºÁ`°|

¤¤µØ¥Á°ê°üÀù

Âå¾Ç·|

2009.2.14-15

«n°Ï°üÀù¾Ç³N¬ã°Q·|

¦¨¥\¤j¾ÇÂå°|

¥xÆW°üÀùÂå¾Ç·| (©P®¶¶§¤j¤Ò)

2009.5.2-3

²Ä¤Q¥|©¡¥xÆWÀù¯gÁp¦X¾Ç³N¦~·|

°ê¨¾Âå¾Ç¤¤¤ß

¤¤µØ¥Á°ê°üÀù

Âå¾Ç·|        

2009.8.1-2

¥_°Ï°üÀù¾Ç³N¬ã°Q·|

°ò¶©ªø©°Âå°|

¤¤µØ¥Á°ê°üÀù

Âå¾Ç·|

(±i§Ê¹ü¤j¤Ò)

2009.11.¤¤¦¯

¤¤°Ï°üÀù¾Ç³N¬ã°Q·|

¹ü¤Æ°ò·þ±ÐÂå°|

¥xÆW°üÀùÂå¾Ç·| (³¯¤l©M¤j¤Ò)

 

 

¤G¡B²Ä¤»©¡²Ä¥|¦¸²zºÊ¨ÆÁp®u·|ij³ø§i

¯µ®Ñªø³ø§i¡G

    (¤@)¡B°]°Èª¬ªp³ø§i¡GºI¦Ü97¦~10¤ë©³¤î¡G

  ¬¡Àx¡]¹ü»È¡^¡G959,966¤¸       °òª÷¡]µØ«n¡^¡G1,224,192¤¸

¶l¬F¹º¼·¡G1,198,812¤¸         ²{ª÷¡G6,058¤¸

 

    (¤G)¡B8¤ë¡B9¤ë¤Î10¤ëªº·|°T¤wE-mailµ¹©Ò¦³·|­û¨Ã©ñ¸m©ó¾Ç·|ºô¯¸¤W¡C

(¤T)¡BÁÂÁ¤j®a¼ö±¡°Ñ»P10¤ë¥÷ªºIGCS¦~·|¡C

    (¥|)¡B97¦~12¤ë20¤é¥»¦~«×¡u±M¬ìÂå®vºÂ¼f¡vµ§¸Õ¦aÂI¡G°¨°ºÂå°|ºÖ­µ¼Ó9¼Ó²Ä¥|Á¿°ó¡A®É¶¡¡G10¡G00¡ã11¡G30¡F¤f¸Õ¦aÂI¡G°¨°ºÂå°|ºÖ­µ¼Ó8¼Ó¸³¨Æ·|ij«Ç¡B¥­¦w¼Ó12¼Ó12043«Ç¤Î12C·|ij«Ç¡A®É¶¡¡G13¡G00¡ã17¡G00¡F¥»·|¦³5¦ì¦Ò¥Í³ø¦Ò¡A¸ê®æ¤w³q¹L¼f®Ö¡C¦U¦ì¥XÃDªºÂå®v½Ð¦b12¤ë¤W¦¯±N¦ÒÃD¥æµ¹§E¼}½åÂå®v¡C

  (¤­)¡B·Ç±M¬ìÂå®v¸ê®æ¼f®Ö¿ìªk­×­q¤Î°V½m¹ê¬I¨Æ©y³ø§i (ªþ¥ó)

(¤»)¡B¡u²Ä¤Q¥|©¡¥xÆWÀù¯gÁp¦X¾Ç³N¦~·|¡v­q©ó98¦~5¤ë2¡B3¤é¡A¦aÂI¡G°ê¨¾Âå¾Ç¤¤¤ß¡A¥DÃD¡GMolecular Oncology-Puhing Cancer Management a Step Forwards¡F¾À³ø½×¤åµû¼f¥»·|­ì¥»±À¬£±i§Ê¹üÂå®v¤Î¸­ÁpµÏÂå®v¡A¦ý±i§Ê¹üÂå®v¬°¥D¿ì³æ¦ì¥D­n­t³d¤H¡A©Ò¥H¥»·|·|¥t¥~±À¬£µû¼f¡A¨Ã«ØÄ³¥D¿ì³æ¦ìµû¼f©e­û¤À¦¨°ò¦²Õ¤ÎÁ{§É²Õ¡C¾À³ø½×¤åºÂ¿ïºI½Z¤é¡G98¦~2¤ë15¤é¡]¬P´Á¤é¡^24¡G00¤î¡A§ë½Z¤è¦¡¡G97¦~11¤ë16¤é°_¡A¦Üºô¯¸¡]www.hancan.com.tw¡^¬d¸ß¤Î¤U¸ü¡C

 

¦U©e­û·|¤u§@³ø§i¡G

       (¤@)¡B·|­û¸ê®æ¼f¬d©e­û·|¡]³¯¬è¦wÂå®v¡^¡G¤­¦ì­n¦Ò±M¬ìÂå®vºÂ¼f¤Î2¦ì¥Ó½Ð¤J·|¼f®Ö¸ê®æ³q¹L¡C

(¤G)¡B±Ð¨|©e­û·|¡]©P®¶¶§Âå®v¡^¡u±M¬ìÂå®v¦A±Ð¨|®×¡v¡G

1¡B²Ä¥|±ø§ó§ï¬°¨ä¥L°üÀù¡]Vaginal cancer, Tubal cancer---µ¥¡^©Î¦³Ãö¸ó¬ì¦X§@¡]¥]¬Aªc§¿¬ì¡B¤j¸zª½¸z¬ì¡^¤§¤â³N¦Ü¤Ö6¨Ò¡C

2¡B¦Ò¶q¹ê»Ú¤Wªº¥DÆ[±ø¥ó¡AR/Tªº°V½mÀÀ­×§ï¬°case-oriented¥²¶·Ãº¥æªvÀø­p¹º¡B¾¯¶q¡Bdosimetry-----µ¥¡A¨Ó¨ú¥N©T©w©óR/T¤@­Ó¤ëªº°V½m³W©w¡C

3¡B§¹¦¨«á¥²¶·¸g¥Ñ±Ð¨|©e­û·|»{©w³q¹L¨Ãµoµ¹¸ê®æÃÒ©ú¡A©l±o³ø¦Ò±M¬ìÂå®vºÂ¼f¡C

4¡B¨Ã¥Ñ¯µ®Ñ³B­t³d°lÂÜFellow¤§°V½m¡C

(¤T)¡B¾Ç³N¬ã¨s©e­û·|¡]±i§Ê¹üÂå®v¡^¡u¾Ç³N¬ã¨s©e­û®×¡v¡G

§Æ±æ¾Ç·|¯à«Ø¥ß¤@­Ó¬ã¨s¥­¥x¡A¥H¥xÆW¬°°ò¦ªº study¡A¦¨¥ßÃþ¦ü¬ü°êªºGOG¡BÁú°êªºKGOG¤Î¤é¥»ªºJGOG¤§²Õ´¡A¥H¤T¤j°ü¬ìÀù¯g¬°¥DÃD¡A¨C¤@­Ó¥DÃD±ÀÁ|¤@¦ì¥l¶°¤H¡A¥H¸ê²`ªº¥D¥ô¾á·í¬°©y¡ACervical Cancer±À¬£¿àã¼zÂå®v¾á¥ô¥l¶°¤H¡FEndometrial Cancer±À¬£ÃC©ú½åÂå®v¾á¥ô¥l¶°¤H¡FOvarian Cancer±À¬£©P®¶¶§Âå®v¾á¥ô¥l¶°¤H¡FIDMC±À¬£³¯¬è¦wÂå®v¾á¥ô¥l¶°¤H¡C¸Ô²Óªº¹ê¬I¤Î¸g¶OªºÄw±¹¡A±i§Ê¹üÂå®v¶i¤@¨B³W¹º¡C

 

Á{®É°Êij

    11¤ë29¤é¦b¤Ñ¥À¥Ñ°ê¥Á°·±d§½Á|¿ì¡uªk¤H½×¾Â¡v¡A°Q½×¬O§_¥Ñ¬F©²¥þ­±¹ê¬I¥þ¥Á¬I¥´¤l®cÀVÀù¬Ì­]¡A½Ð¾Ç·|ªí¹F¥ß³õ¡C¡]¯µ®Ñ³B¡^

¨Mij¡G¥H¾Ç³N¥ß³õ¬Ý¡A¦]¥Ø«e°lÂÜ´Á¤£°÷ªø¡A¦w¥þ©Ê©|¥¼§¹¥þ½T¥ß¡A¦Ó¥BHPV¬Ì­]¥u¥]¬Atype16¤Î18¡A¶È¦³®Ä²[»\¦û¬ù65-70¢Hªº¤l®cÀVÀù¡A¬G¥»¾Ç·|¥ß³õ¤£ÃÙ¦¨¥Ø«e¹ê¬I¤½¶O¬I¥´¡C

 

 

¤T¡B2008 IGCS ·|ij¤º®eµ×µØ

 11/22¦b¹üÀبq¶ÇÂå°|©ÒÁ|¿ìªº¤¤°Ï°üÀù¾Ç³N¬ã°Q·|·í¤¤¡A°¨°ºÂå°|±i§Ó¶©¤j¤Ò»P°ª¶¯ºaÁ`¼B¤å¶¯¤j¤Ò¬°·|­û­ÌÁ¿­z¤µ¦~IGCS ·|ij¤¤Ãö©ócervical cancer¡Bendometrial cancer¡Bovarian cancer ¤è­±ªºµ×µØ¡Cºëªö¤º®e±N©óªñ¤éE-mail µ¹¦U¦ì¡C

 

¥|¡B¡u²Ä¤Q¥|©¡¥xÆWÀù¯gÁp¦X¾Ç³N¦~·|¡v¾À³ø½×¤åºÂ¿ï

ºI½Z¤é´Á¡G2009¦~2¤ë15¤é¡]¬P´Á¤é¡^24¡G00¤î¡A¹O®É¤£¤©¨ü²z

¼úÀy¤º®e¡G°ò¦¡BÁ{§ÉÃþ¦U10¦W¡Aµoªí¤fÀY³ø§i¡B¹{µo¼úª¬¡B¼úª÷¡]¼úª÷³¡¥÷¡G«e3¦W¨C¦W3¸U¤¸¡A²Ä4¨ì²Ä10¦W¨C¦W1¸U¤¸¡^

§ë½Z¤è¦¡¡G2008¦~11¤ë16¤é°_¡A¦Ü¤U¦Cºô¯¸¬d¸ß¤Î¤U¸ü

          www.hancan.com.tw

¡°¯S§Oª`·N¨Æ¶µ¡G¥»¦¸¾À³ø½×¤å¥Hºô¸ô¤W¶Ç¤è¦¡§ë½Z¡A±N·|³]©wºI¤î®É¶¡¡A½Ð¦U·|­û°È¥²°t¦X¡A¦bºI¤î®É¶¡¤§«e§¹¦¨¤W¶Ç°Ê§@¡C

 

¤­¡B¡u²Ä¤Q¥|©¡¥xÆWÀù¯gÁp¦X¾Ç³N¦~·|¡vLogo¼x½Z

½t¥Ñ¡G¥xÆWÀù¯gÁp¦X¾Ç³N¦~·|¬O°ê¤º­«­nªºÀù¯g¾Ç³N°Q½×¦~·|¡A©w´ÁÁ|¿ì¤w¸g¦³³sÄò13¦~ªº¾ú¥v¡C¸g2008¦~8¤ë23¤é²Ä14©¡²Ä¤@¦¸Äw³Æ·|ij°Q½×«á¨Mij¡AÁp¦X¦~·|À³¦³¥Nªí¨äºë¯«ªºLogo¡A¨Ã¦V¦U¾Ç·|·|­û¼x½Z¡C

³]­p¤º®e¡G

1¡B¥Nªí¥xÆWÀù¯gÁp¦X¦~·|ºë¯«¡]¨Ò¦p¡G8°¦¤p¿ÀÃɦX¦¨¤@°¦¤j¿ÀÃÉ¡A©Î¬O¤@°¦¿ÀÃɴߤW¦³8­Ó¤pÂIµ¥µ¥¡K¡K¡K¡^

2¡B¤¤¤å¼ÐÃD¡G¡u¥xÆWÀù¯gÁp¦X¾Ç³N¦~·|¡v

3¡B­^¤å¼ÐÃD¡G¡uTaiwan Joint Cancer Conference¡v

4¡B¦p¸g±Ä¥Î­PÃØ¼úª÷8000¤¸

5¡B§ë½Z½Ð±H¡G14tjcc@gmail.com

     6¡BºI½Z¤é´Á¡G2008¦~12¤ë15¤é

 

¤»¡B¾Ç·|ºô¯¸¸Û¼x½Ã±Ð¤å³¹

Åwªï¦U¦ì·|­û¿ãÅD½ç½Z¡A¥H¥R¹ê¾Ç·|ªººô¯¸¤º®e¡C¨Ó½Z½Ðe-mail¦Ütago.gyn@gmail.com

 

 

 

¶L¡B ·|­û°ÊºA¤Î·N¨£»P¦^À³

(Åwªï´£¨Ñ·|­û°ÊºA¡B·N¨£¡A¥H¤Î½Ã±Ð¤å³¹¡]¾Ç·|E-mail address: tago.gyn@gmail.com)

 

 

ƒò¡B «e¤ë¤åÄm¿ï¿ý

(Ref 1)

³æ³æ¦³lymphovascular invasion ªºearly endometrial cancer¡A ­n¤£­nexternal beam radiation ?

(Ref 2)

¥Hhysteroscopy ¨Ó¶i¦æendometrial cancer ªºsentinel lymph node identification

(Ref 3)

¹ï©ó recurrent endometrial cancer ªº·s¤T¦X¤@regimen: carboplatin + paclitaxel + topotecan

(Ref 4)

Uterine carcinosarcoma: lymphadenectomy ¦³¯q¡Airradiation «hµL

(Ref 5)

¦Ñ¦~ªºendometrial cancer ¤´©y«ØÄ³¤â³NªvÀø

 

 

 

(Ref 1) Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Oct;111(1):49-54.

Adjuvant radiation for early stage endometrial cancer with lymphovascular invasion.
Croog VJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Barakat RR, Alektiar KM.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of the decrease in use of postoperative pelvic external beam radiation (EBRT) in favor of intravaginal RT (IVRT) alone in patients with early stage endometrial cancer who had lymphovascular invasion (LVI). METHODS: Between 11/1988 and 5/2005, 126 patients treated with simple hysterectomy and postoperative RT had a final pathologic diagnosis of stage IB-IIB adenocarcinoma of endometrioid histology with documented LVI. The patients were divided into two groups based on the era of treatment, (early era: 1988-1996, vs. late era: 1997-2005), in order to best capture the shift away from the routine use of EBRT in favor of surgical staging and IVRT. RESULTS: Of the 126 patients, 35% (n=44) were treated in the early era and 65% (n=82) in the late era. The two groups were balanced in regards to age, race, depth of myometrial invasion, histologic grade, and cervical involvement. Significantly more patients had surgical staging and received IVRT alone in the late than early era (p=0.0001, 0.004, respectively). The rate of pelvic control was 93% for the early era compared to 97% for latter era (p=0.3). There was no significant impact of the treatment era on vaginal control, disease-free survival, or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the mere presence of LVI need not trigger the use of pelvic EBRT. Instead, the decision on whether to omit EBRT in patients with LVI should be made in the context of a patient's competing risk factors and comorbid conditions.

 

(Ref 2) Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Oct;111(1):62-7.

Cervical and hysteroscopic injection for identification of sentinel lymph node in endometrial cancer.
Perrone AM
, Casadio P, Formelli G, Levorato M, Ghi T, Costa S, Meriggiola MC, Pelusi G.
Centre for Sexual Health, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. amperrone@libero.it
OBJECTIVES: The aims of our study were to evaluate the possibility of identifying the sentinel lymph node (SLN) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) and to directly compare two injection techniques, cervical and hysteroscopic injection. METHODS: Fifty-four patients with endometrial carcinoma, clinical stages I and II, were submitted to complete surgical staging through laparoscopy, as recommended by FIGO in 1988. For the mapping procedure the patients were divided into two groups of injection: the cervical injection group and hysteroscopic injection group. Technetium (Tc) 99m radiocolloid was used as tracer. RESULTS: Intraoperative detection rate of SLN was 70% in cervical group and 65% in the hysteroscopic group (p=n.s.). In the cervical group, all patients had SLN in the pelvis only and the mean SLN removed was 18 (range 2-26). In the hysteroscopic group, all patients had SNLs in the pelvis and two patients had SLN both in the pelvis and above the bifurcation of the aorta. Mean pelvic SLN removed was 20 (range 8-42). CONCLUSIONS: Our data shows that it is possible to identify the SLN in tumours of the endometrium. Both cervical and hysteroscopic techniques are feasible but the hysteroscopic procedure might represent the only method able to highlight the complete lymphatic drainage of the uterus as suggested by the presence of paraaortic positive SLN only in this group.

 

(Ref 3) Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Oct;111(1):27-34.

Paclitaxel, topotecan, and carboplatin in metastatic endometrial cancinoma: a Hellenic Co-operative Oncology Group (HeCOG) study.
Papadimitriou CA, Fountzilas G, Bafaloukos D, Bozas G, Kalofonos H, Pectasides D, Aravantinos G, Bamias A, Dimopoulos MA; Hellenic Co-operative Oncology Group.
Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece. chr_papadim@yahoo.gr
OBJECTIVE: Taxanes, and platinum compounds represent the chemotherapeutic agents with the greatest activity in metastatic endometrial carcinoma. We administered the combination of paclitaxel, topotecan and carboplatin to patients with metastatic or recurrent carcinoma of the endometrium to evaluate its activity and to define its toxicity. METHODS: Thirty-nine consecutive patients were treated on an outpatient basis with paclitaxel 150 mg/m(2), administered intravenously over a 3-h period and followed by carboplatin at AUC of 5 on day 3, with both agents proceding topotecan that was given at 0.75 mg/m(2)/day on days 1 through 3. The chemotherapy was repeated every 3 weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support for a maximum of six courses. RESULTS: Twenty-one (60%) patients achieved objective clinical response (95% CI, 42.2-75.7%) including 4 (11.4%) complete and 17 (48.6%) partial responses. The median times to progression and survival for all patients were 8.9 and 17.7 months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 thombocytopenia and neutropenia occurred in 5 (13%) and 4 (10%) patients, respectively, but only 2 episodes of neutropenic fever were encountered. Grade 2 or 3 neurotoxicity was observed in 23% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of paclitaxel, topotecan and carboplatin with G-CSF support appears active with acceptable toxicity in patients with metastatic or recurrent carcinoma of the endometrium.

 

 (Ref 4) Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Oct;111(1):82-8.

Assessing the effects of lymphadenectomy and radiation therapy in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma: a SEER analysis.
Nemani D, Mitra N, Guo M, Lin L.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this analysis is to determine the pathologic prognostic factors and treatment outcome of patients with carcinosarcoma of the uterus. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program of the National Cancer Institute between January 1, 1988 and November 1, 2003 was conducted. A total of 1855 with AJCC Stages I-III disease were identified who received primary surgical treatment. Overall survival curves were constructed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors predictive of overall survival. RESULTS: AJCC stage of all patients was as follows: 65% Stage I (n=1099), 14% Stage II (n=245), 21% Stage III (n=353). 57% (n=965) patients underwent LND. The median number of lymph nodes removed was 12 (SD=10.2); 119 (14%) patients had positive lymph nodes. Five-year overall survival (OS), disease free survival, and median survival were significantly improved for patients receiving lymph node dissection (LND) as compared to patients that received no LND, irrespective of radiotherapy. Adjuvant radiation therapy had no improvement on overall survival regardless of LND. There was no overall survival benefit to the addition of radiotherapy regardless of whether patients underwent a lymph node dissection or not. Age, race, marital status, lymph node dissection and stage were predictive of survival on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphadenectomy is significantly associated with improved overall survival in patients with Stage I-III uterine carcinosarcoma compared to no lymphadenectomy. The use of adjuvant radiotherapy conferred no overall survival benefit.

 

(Ref 5) Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Oct;111(1):35-40.

The impact of surgery on survival of elderly women with endometrial cancer in the SEER program from 1992-2002.
Ahmed A, Zamba G, DeGeest K, Lynch CF.
Department of OB/GYN, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52246, USA. amina.ahmed-md@advocatehealth.com
OBJECTIVES: Few population-based studies have evaluated surgical treatment and outcomes in elderly patients with endometrial cancer. The National Cancer Institute's SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results, Program provides a database to examine this issue. The objective of this study was to determine the extent to which elderly women with endometrial cancer receive surgical treatment and to evaluate the impact of surgery on survival. METHODS: Data were obtained from the SEER registries for expanded races from 1992-2002. The inclusion criteria were women ages 50 to 95 with pathologically confirmed endometrial cancer. Cases with multiple primaries were excluded. The data were examined with respect to histology, radiotherapy use, extent of surgery and FIGO stage. The survival data were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard model. Chi-squared tests were used to examine the extent to which elderly women with endometrial cancer receive surgical treatment, hysterectomy at minimum. Endometrial cancer-specific mortality was analyzed. RESULTS: 27,517 women were analyzed with 94% of the cohort receiving surgical treatments. There is a significant trend that suggests elderly women, aged 65+ years at time of endometrial cancer diagnosis, received surgical treatment less often than younger women (p<0.001). The age-adjusted hazard of death was reduced with surgical intervention. After adjustment for stage at diagnosis, histology, and radiotherapy, the hazard ratios for endometrial cancer-specific mortality were decreased when surgery was undertaken. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based study, the poor prognosis associated with advanced age may be in part associated with the decreased frequency of surgical treatment. The reasons need to be further investigated. Continued efforts should be directed at providing surgical treatment for elderly patients with endometrial cancer.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ªþ¥ó

¥xÆW°üÀùÂå¾Ç·|

°üÀù±M¬ìÂå®v°V½m¿ìªk¤Î¸ê®æ¼f®Ö­nÂI

²Ä¤@±ø¡G»Ý¶·¦V¾Ç·|¥Ó½Ð¬°·Ç·|­û¡C

²Ä¤G±ø¡G»Ý¶·¨C¦~°Ñ¥[·|­û¤j·|¤Î¦a°Ï¾Ç³N¬ã°Q·|¦Ü¤Ö¤@¦¸¡AµLªk°Ñ¥[À³­n¨Æ¥ý¦V¾Ç·|½Ð°²¡A¨Ã¸g±Ð¨|©e­û·|¦P·N³Æ®×¡C

²Ä¤T±ø¡G»Ý¶·¦V¾Ç·|´£¥X¥¼¨Ó¨â¦~°üÀù±M¬ì°V½mªº°V½m­p¹º¡]¥Ñsupervisorñ¦W»{¥i¡^¡A©ó¥»·|»{¥i¤§¦Ü¤Ö¦³¨â¦ì°üÀù±M¬ìÂå®v¤§Âå°|±µ¨ü°ü¬ì¸~½F¤§±M¬ì°V½mº¡¤G¦~¡C

²Ä¥|±ø¡G°üÀù¤â³N¤§°V½m(¾á¥ô¦Ü¤Ö¬°²Ä¤@§U¤â¤§®×¨Ò)¡G¤l®cÀVÀù®Ú°£¤â³N¦Ü¤Ö20¨Ò¡B¤l®c¤º½¤Àù¤â³N¦Ü¤Ö10¨Ò¡B§Z±_Àù´î¿n¤â³N¦Ü¤Ö10¨Ò¡B¤Î¨ä¥L°üÀù¡]Vaginal cancer, Tubal cancer, Vulvar cancer---µ¥¡^©Î¦³Ãö¸ó¬ì¦X§@¤§¤â³N¦Ü¤Ö5¨Ò¡C

²Ä¤­±ø¡G°üÀù¯f²z¤§°V½m45¨Ò¡G¶·¯à¶EÂ_±`¨£ªº°üÀù¯e¯f¡A¥]¬A¤l®cÀVÀù¡B§Z±_Àù¡B¤l®c¤º½¤Àù¡C(«ü¾É¤§¯f²z¬ì±M¬ìÂå®vÃÒ©ú)

²Ä¤»±ø¡G³±¹DÃèÀˬd: ¾Þ§@³±¹DÃè¶EÂ_¦Ü¤Ö50¨Ò¡C

²Ä¤C±ø¡G©ñ®g½u¸~½FªvÀø»Ý±µ¨ü¦Ü¤Ö¤@­Ó¤ëªº°V½m°Ñ»PªvÀø¦Ü¤Ö6¨Ò¡C(´£¨Ñ«ü¾É¤§©ñ®g½u¸~½F±M¬ìÂå®vÃÒ©ú)

²Ä¤K±ø¡G°Ñ»P°üÀù¤Æ¾ÇªvÀø¦Ü¤Ö20¨Ò¡C

²Ä¤E±ø¡G¦Û±µ¨ü°üÀù±M¬ì°V½m°_¦Ü°Ñ¥[°üÀù±M¬ìÂå®v¦Ò¸Õ¤§¶¡¡A¦³°üÀù¬ÛÃö¤§­ìµÛ½×¤å©Î­Ó®×³ø§i¦Ü¤Ö¤@½g¡A¥B¬°²Ä¤@§@ªÌ©Î³q°T§@ªÌ¡C

²Ä¤Q±ø¡G¾Ç·|©w´Á¦Ò®Ö°V½m­p¹º¬I¦æ±¡§Î¡A¥]¬A·Ç·|­û»Ý´£¥X¤§®Ñ­±¤Î¤fÀY³ø§i¡C

®Ñ­±³ø§i¨C¦~ú¥æ¨â¦¸¡AºI½Z¤é´Á¬°1/31¤Î7/31¡A³ø§i¤º®e»Ý¥]¬A¥Dªv©Î¨ó§Uªº¯f¤H¯f¨ÒºK­n¡C

¤fÀY³ø§i¨C¦~¤@¦¸¡A®É¶¡¬°°üÀù¨C©u¾Ç³N°Q½×·|¤é´Á¡A¤º®e§t°üÀùÁ{§É¬ã¨s½×¤å¡B¤ÆÀø¡B©ñÀø¡B³±¹DÃè¡B°Ñ»P¬ã¨s¡B½×¤å¡A±N¨Ó°V½m³W¹º¡A¹J¨ì¤°»ò§xÃø¡B»Ý­n¤°»ò¨ó§U¡A§¹¦¨«á¸g±Ð¨|©e­û·|»{©w³q¹L¨Ãµoµ¹¸ê®æÃÒ©ú¡A©l±o³ø¦Ò±M¬ìÂå®vºÂ¼f¡C

 

©ñ®g½u¸~½F°V½m«á¡A­Ó®×ªí®æ

¤é´Á

¯f¨Ò¸¹½X

¦~ÄÖ

¶EÂ_

©ñ®gªvÀø§Þ³N

¾¯¶q¤Î¦¸¼Æ

Target delineation

F/U

«ü¾ÉÂå®v®Ö³¹

 

XXX

31

Cx Ca IIb

IMRT c SIB

60 Gy/30fr

GTV, CTV60, CTV50(Int.ext

 

 

 

 

 

Cx Ca IIb

Brachytherapy

30 Gy/6fr

To point A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2008-vol ±i¶K¤é´Á¡G2008/12/31 ÂI²v¼Æ¡G2168
<<¤W¤@«h | ¤U¤@«h>>